From: victor@cs.concordia.ca (KRAWCZUK victor)
Subject: Re: Does DECada 1.1 really use POSIX 1003 draft 4 threads...
Date: 10 Mar 93 00:31:43 GMT
Date: 1993-03-10T00:31:43+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5827@daily-planet.concordia.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EMERY.93Feb22132216@goldfinger.mitre.org
In article <EMERY.93Feb22132216@goldfinger.mitre.org> emery@goldfinger.mitre.org (David Emery) writes:
>These POSIX blocking behaviors are defined in P1003.5, and are
>independent of the use of POSIX.4a threads. (They can be supported
>via threads, or any other implementation technique.)
>
BTW Dave, I think I read somewhere that P1003.5 will be changed to
incorporate P1003.4 (real-time extensions) into an Ada mold (P1003.5).
Is this true? If yes, what's the timeframe? Should I hold my
breath waiting for this new version of P1003.5, or should I
reluctantly start making my own "hack" P1003.4 Ada bindings ;-).
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Victor Krawczuk (e-mail : victor@cs.concordia.ca ) |
| Concordia University, Dept. of Computer Science (H-961) |
| 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1M8 |
prev parent reply other threads:[~1993-03-10 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-02-10 2:42 Does DECada 1.1 really use POSIX 1003 draft 4 threads Rich S. Ishikawa
1993-02-22 15:51 ` cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool
1993-02-22 18:22 ` David Emery
1993-03-10 0:31 ` KRAWCZUK victor [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox