From: Warren <ve3wwg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Passing Ada Proc as a C Function Pointer
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2010-08-04T17:45:19-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <581d2a1a-d7bb-48f5-9ca6-ae3c0e27c9bf@d17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2bp9i9n5z.fsf@pushface.org
On Aug 4, 3:46 pm, Simon Wright <si...@pushface.org> wrote:
> I would be a bit worried about Thread_Proc's *Ada* environment. There's
> this thing called the Secondary Stack, used for - for example - string
> catenation; and it's not set up here.
Yikes, that could be a problem. I vaguely remember something about
a "secondary stack". I'm going to need to research this.
> I think you'll be OK so long as you restrain yourself! Twiddling LEDs
> should be OK.
Well LED twiddling is just the "hello world" test. I hope to do
a lot more than that, down the road!
> There may be a pragma to prevent secondary stack usage?
I'm all ears! ;-)
Warren
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 16:40 Passing Ada Proc as a C Function Pointer Warren
2010-08-04 17:14 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-08-05 0:24 ` Warren
2010-08-04 18:46 ` Jeffrey Carter
2010-08-04 19:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-08-05 0:42 ` Warren
2010-08-05 0:55 ` Warren
2010-08-04 19:46 ` Simon Wright
2010-08-05 0:45 ` Warren [this message]
2010-08-05 7:33 ` Rolf
2010-08-05 20:50 ` Simon Wright
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-05 14:31 Warren
2010-08-05 15:37 ` Warren
2010-08-05 16:51 ` Warren
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox