From: smccoy@hisd.harris.com (Scott McCoy)
Subject: Re: Reasons NOT To Choose Ada
Date: 1996/11/11
Date: 1996-11-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568bor$ob9@su102w.ess.harris.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 32872161.19FE@eurocontrol.fr
In article <32872161.19FE@eurocontrol.fr>, Steve Jones - JON <Steve.Jones@eurocontrol.fr> writes:
|>
|> 6. There is no VisualAda or Borland Ada. Most Ada compilers are
|> still rather poor. They tell you what the problem is in the same
|> way a C compiler does.
|>
There is (or was) a VisualAda product. Was pretty good, too. I'm
afraid I haven't kept up with it or the company that made it, but I
was very happy with the tool when I did. I especially liked building
rapid prototypes with it, because I found I didn't have to throw away
as much of the prototype app as I did with other languages.
--
Scott McCoy
Harris Information Systems Division
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-11-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E0Mo5L.n2E@atf.cmg.nl>
1996-11-10 0:00 ` Reasons NOT To Choose Ada Smith A. Cat
1996-11-11 0:00 ` Steve Jones - JON
1996-11-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-11-11 0:00 ` Scott McCoy [this message]
1996-11-13 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1996-11-13 0:00 ` Brendan WALKER
1996-11-13 0:00 ` Reasons NOT To Choose Ada (NOT!) Dirk Dickmanns
1996-12-02 0:00 ` Reasons NOT To Choose Ada Craig Spannring
1996-12-04 0:00 ` Dana Miller
1996-12-05 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-12-06 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-12-06 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-12-09 0:00 ` Craig Spannring
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Dave Wood
1996-12-20 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
[not found] ` <01bbd2c9$f8707680$14080c26@cat>
1996-11-15 0:00 ` Vincent Celier
1996-11-16 0:00 ` Geert Bosch
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox