From: fjh@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson)
Subject: Re: LGPL Requirements (was: Selecting Ada95 compiler for MSDOS realtime application)
Date: 1996/11/09
Date: 1996-11-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5613o1$se6@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 560nst$bnu@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu
WhiteR@CRPL.Cedar-Rapids.lib.IA.US (Robert S. White) writes:
]In article <55v2eq$8qq@news.nyu.edu>, kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu says...
]>>While I now understand that GNAT may be used to produce
]>>propriatary,for-profit executables, the last sentence of the special
]>>exception warns me to do so very carefully.
]>
]>What are you talking about? What's your concern here?
]>
]>All that sentence is saying is that if you have executable that would
]>be covered by the GPL by virtue of including a GPL'ed file, the mere
]>presence of that library file doesn't mean you can ignore that fact.
]
]>In other words, that fact that GNAT itself contains that file does not
]>mean that it no longer is covered by the GPL.
]
] Huh? What file? So the GPL still applies?
Let me clarify:
All that sentence [the last sentence of the special exception
to the GLP in the copying conditions of a GNAT library file] is
saying is that if you have an executable that would be covered
by the GPL by virtue of including a GPL'ed file [some *other*
GPL'd file], the mere presence of that library file [the GNAT
library file] doesn't mean you can ignore that fact [the fact
that your executable is covered by the GPL, since it includes
that *other* GPL'd file].
For example, the fact that GNAT itself contains that file [the
GNAT library file] does not mean that it [the GNAT executable]
no longer is covered by the GPL. [The GNAT executable is covered
by the GPL because the non-library files in GNAT are covered
by the GLP.]
If your executable is produced by linking only your own proprietry code
and the GNAT libraries, then it is NOT covered by the GPL.
] All of the above still has me very confused. You need to make it
]crystal clear to lawyers that there is not a problem. I do not think that
]you and Robert Dewar have completely re-assured Richard, Britt and me that
]there is not a problem.
If your executable is produced by linking only your own proprietry code
and the GNAT libraries, then it is NOT covered by the GPL.
I'm sure that Rober Dewar, Richard Kenner, or Richard Stallman
will confirm this for you if you ask them.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-11-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-11-07 0:00 LGPL Requirements (was: Selecting Ada95 compiler for MSDOS realtime application) F. Britt Snodgrass
1996-11-07 0:00 ` Dale Pontius
1996-11-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-11-07 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1996-11-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-11-08 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-11-08 0:00 ` F. Britt Snodgrass
1996-11-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-11-08 0:00 ` Richard Kenner
1996-11-09 0:00 ` Robert S. White
1996-11-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-11-09 0:00 ` Richard Kenner
1996-11-09 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson [this message]
1996-11-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] ` <562p07$cf8@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu>
1996-11-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox