From: pontius@btv.ibm.com (Dale Pontius)
Subject: OS/2 GNAT emx 0.9C
Date: 1996/11/07
Date: 1996-11-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55t2sj$1b5e@mdnews.btv.ibm.com> (raw)
Has this combination been tested? I know GNAT 3.05 was built
using emx 0.9b, but there are now packages out there (XFree86/2
being the one that comes to mind.) that require emx 0.9c fix1.
(I'm under the impression that emx 0.9c breaks things without
fix1.)
Has someone tried this, or am I going to have to be the pioneer?
Thanks,
Dale Pontius
(NOT speaking for IBM)
next reply other threads:[~1996-11-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-11-07 0:00 Dale Pontius [this message]
1996-11-08 0:00 ` OS/2 GNAT emx 0.9C Geert Bosch
1996-11-08 0:00 ` Tarjei Jensen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox