From: "Frédéric Praca" <frederic.praca@free.fr>
Subject: Re: Representation clauses and side-efects on STM32F411 ravenscar runtime
Date: 15 Aug 2015 14:22:25 GMT
Date: 2015-08-15T16:22:25+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55cf4b21$0$3013$426a74cc@news.free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mpni47$j96$1@dont-email.me
Le Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:08:55 +0000, Simon Clubley a écrit :
> On 2015-08-02, Frédéric Praca <frederic.praca@free.fr> wrote:
>> For example, with the following declaration:
>>
>> type Mantissa is range 0 .. 2**12 - 1 with Size => 12;
>> type Fraction is range 0 .. 2**4 - 1 with Size => 4;
>>
>> type Baud_Rate_Register is
>> record
>> DIV_Fraction : Fraction; DIV_Mantissa : Mantissa;
>> end record with Size => 32;
>> for Baud_Rate_Register use
>> record
>> DIV_Fraction at 0 range 0 .. 3; DIV_Mantissa at 0 range 4 ..
>> 15;
>> end record;
>>
>> If I write
>> USART2.BRR.DIV_Mantissa := 16#445#; USART2.BRR.DIV_Fraction :=
16#c#;
>> A memory dump shows the final content to be 0x00005c5c whereas
>> intermediary result was 0x00004450 as expected.
>> n the other hand, if I write
>> USART2.BRR := Baud_Rate_Register'(DIV_Mantissa => 16#445#,
>> DIV_Fraction => 16#c#);
>>
>> There is no problem, the final content is 0x0000445c as expected.
>>
>> Did someone experience such kind of behaviour with STM32 class micro-
>> controllers ?
>
> Look at the generated assembly code for the first example with objdump;
> I suspect you will find there are load and/or store by byte references
> in there.
>
> Given the hardware restrictions on the size of accesses to the registers
> that will cause Bad Things (TM) to happen.
>
> Simon.
Hello Simon,
assembly has never been my favourite language and I only studied 68000
assembly a long time ago :)
I don't know what you really mean by "load and/or store by byte
references".
So, here's what I get by using objdump
USART2.BRR.DIV_Mantissa := 16#445#;
8000404: f44f 4388 mov.w r3, #17408 ; 0x4400
8000408: f2c4 0300 movt r3, #16384 ; 0x4000
800040c: 891a ldrh r2, [r3, #8]
800040e: f240 4145 movw r1, #1093 ; 0x445
8000412: f361 120f bfi r2, r1, #4, #12
8000416: 811a strh r2, [r3, #8]
USART2.BRR.DIV_Fraction := 16#c#;
8000418: f44f 4388 mov.w r3, #17408 ; 0x4400
800041c: f2c4 0300 movt r3, #16384 ; 0x4000
8000420: 7a1a ldrb r2, [r3, #8]
8000422: f04f 010c mov.w r1, #12
8000426: f361 0203 bfi r2, r1, #0, #4
800042a: 721a strb r2, [r3, #8]
From what I read in the ARM assembly manual, this seems to be ok from an
assembly point of view so I think this can come from the hardware
restrictions. Am I right ?
Fred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-15 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-02 8:59 Representation clauses and side-efects on STM32F411 ravenscar runtime Frédéric Praca
2015-08-02 9:40 ` Simon Wright
2015-08-02 10:22 ` Simon Wright
2015-08-02 14:53 ` Frédéric Praca
2015-08-02 14:52 ` Frédéric Praca
2015-08-02 15:19 ` Simon Wright
2015-08-02 19:23 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-08-02 19:54 ` Bob Duff
2015-08-02 20:01 ` Frédéric Praca
2015-08-02 20:13 ` Bob Duff
2015-08-02 20:27 ` Frédéric Praca
2015-08-02 20:31 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-08-03 11:08 ` Simon Clubley
2015-08-15 14:22 ` Frédéric Praca [this message]
2015-08-15 15:33 ` Simon Clubley
2015-08-15 17:17 ` Frédéric Praca
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox