From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: My bug or else regarding Visibility Rules
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-04-03T16:21:47-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55c932fa-73a4-4999-a913-71d0d8ff4782@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lysj38hen1.fsf@pushface.org>
On Tuesday, April 2, 2013 1:16:34 PM UTC-7, Simon Wright wrote:
> Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes: > On Tuesday, April 2, 2013 1:26:12 AM UTC-7, Simon Wright wrote: > Other recipients: > Anh Vo <anhvo...@gmail.com> writes:
>> It is dangerous make internal data visible in this case. after careful
>> consideration, I decided to take away part of the post-conditions
>> rather than exposing them. Following the philosophy of Ada, I would
>> not leave any possibilities for the clients to accidently mess it up
>> (not allowing clients to shoot themselve in the foot)
> I think that part of your difficulty is that your Queue is implemented
> using(effectively) global objects (Buffer, In_Index etc).
Actually, it is my intention to design this way. I believe it is called singleton form. I could have designed Queue type as well, as you suggested.
> then you could say something like
>
> procedure Put (Q : in out Queue; Item : Element)
> with Pre => not Queue_Full (Q'Old),
> Post => Item_Added (Q'Old, Q, Item);
I believe that attribute 'Old is allowed in post-conditions only.
> with public
>
> function Item_Added (Old, Current : Queue; Item : Element) return Boolean;
>
>and private
>
> function Item_Added
> (Old, Current : Queue; Item : Element) return Boolean is
> ((Current.In_Index = (Old.In_Index + 1) mod Length) and
> (Current.Buffer (Old.In_Index) = Item) and
> -- (for all I in 1 .. Queue_Length'Old =>
> -- Buffer(I) = Buffer'Old (I)) and
> (not Queue_Empty (Current)));
This way does not look simpler. I rather go with simple way even I decide to use Queue type instead of Singleton Queue.
> I commented out the comparison, because this is a *circular* buffer, so
> the first valid element isn't at Buffer(1).
I do not understand this. Why isn't Buffer(1) valid if my index starts at 1?
> I think it will all work better if you say
> subtype Index is Natural range 0 .. Length - 1;
> so that mod works as you require.
>
> You need to add 1 to the current index and then do mod length!
This is another array index option.
A. Vo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 19:54 My bug or else regarding Visibility Rules Anh Vo
2013-03-28 20:58 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-03-28 22:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-03-30 6:05 ` Anh Vo
2013-04-02 0:56 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-04-02 1:52 ` Anh Vo
2013-04-02 8:26 ` Simon Wright
2013-04-02 18:17 ` Anh Vo
2013-04-02 20:16 ` Simon Wright
2013-04-03 23:21 ` Anh Vo [this message]
2013-04-04 8:19 ` Simon Wright
2013-04-04 19:21 ` Anh Vo
2013-04-04 19:47 ` Simon Wright
2013-04-02 22:04 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-03-28 22:06 ` Anh Vo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox