From: adam@irvine.com (Adam Beneschan)
Subject: Re: Operators Questions
Date: 1996/10/31
Date: 1996-10-31T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55b9mb$kk6@krusty.irvine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: JSA.96Oct31145913@alexandria
jsa@alexandria (Jon S Anthony) writes:
>In article <mheaney-ya023180003010961903550001@news.ni.net> mheaney@ni.net (Matthew Heaney) writes:
>
>> Language designers: any reason overloading of "in" is too difficult for
>> inclusion in the language? Why can't you do this already? This exclusion
>> of the ability to overload "in" seems rather odd and unexpected.
>
>It's a reserved word...
So are "and" and "or" . . .
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-10-31 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-10-29 0:00 Operators Questions Richard Irvine
1996-10-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-10-29 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-11-07 0:00 ` William Frye
1996-10-30 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1996-10-30 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1996-10-31 0:00 ` Adam Beneschan
1996-10-31 0:00 ` Michael F Brenner
1996-10-31 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-10-31 0:00 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
1996-11-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-11-02 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-11-05 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox