comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: simonian@x102c.ess.harris.com (simonian richard 66449)
Subject: Re: Ada Code Efficiency
Date: 25 Feb 91 01:40:34 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5581@trantor.harris-atd.com> (raw)

Our division is currently in the midst of a heated debate with our
customer on this very issue.  Their counterexample is C.  One of their
objections (which they can't really substantiate; they've just heard
of problems) is the performance of Ada on Unix.  My claim is that the
only thing that Unix has to do with Ada performance is in the realm
of tasking, and even then the only problem is when one tries to use
tasks incorrectly.  In-house benchmarks, and data we've gathered from
other sources, indicate that a good Ada compiler with checks on can
approach 90% the performance of the best C compiler, and with checks
off can meet or beat C.  Note that I said _good_ Ada compiler.  There
are dogs out there...  Our basic statement to our customer will be
that this is a compiler issue, not a language issue.



Richard Simonian
Harris Space Systems Corp.  407-633-3800
simonian@x102c.ess.harris.com
rsimonian@nasamail.nasa.gov

             reply	other threads:[~1991-02-25  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1991-02-25  1:40 simonian richard 66449 [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1991-02-22 18:13 Ada Code Efficiency Charles H. Sampson
1991-02-23 19:47 ` Michael Feldman
1991-02-23 23:50   ` Jim Showalter
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox