From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: integers of 1, 2, 4 bytes
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:39:47 +0200
Date: 2014-06-16T00:39:48+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <539e20b4$0$6616$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c06h9rFd1pbU1@mid.individual.net>
On 15/06/14 23:25, hreba wrote:
> All I want is:
> 1. Same behaviour of translated program and original
> 2. Avoid unnecessary range checks.
>
> 1. Same behaviour
> 2. Avoid unnecessary range checks.
If absence of range checks is part of 1., then it seems
an idea to expressly state the intent by
- documenting the intent using pragma Suppress (LRM 11.5),
- asking the compiler to suppress range checks when it
translates a unit.
The 'Size attribute will still be useful for 1., I think.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-15 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-15 17:57 integers of 1, 2, 4 bytes hreba
2014-06-15 18:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-06-15 20:52 ` hreba
2014-06-15 19:07 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-06-15 21:25 ` hreba
2014-06-15 22:39 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2014-06-16 13:37 ` AdaMagica
2014-06-16 4:46 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-06-15 19:26 ` Stefan.Lucks
2014-06-15 21:31 ` hreba
2014-06-15 21:55 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-06-15 22:09 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-06-16 15:38 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-06-16 17:27 ` gautier_niouzes
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox