From: bonak@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Esmail Bonakdarian)
Subject: Is this a (Meridian) compiler bug?
Date: 8 Apr 91 22:22:36 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5385@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> (raw)
It the following subtype declaration (line 3) legal? The LRM seems to
specify a type_mark after the 'is' reserved word (and an optional
constraint).
The Meridian compiler compiles this code without any problems though the
Telesoft compiler I have access to does not like it. I can fix the code by
changing line 3 to
subtype ROW_TYPE is INTEGER range 1 .. ROWS;
Am I reading the LRM incorrectly or have I stumbled across a bug in this
compiler? I would like somebody to confirm this for me before I contact
Meridian (by the way, do they have an e-mail address?).
Thanks.
Esmail
------------------
Meridian AdaVantage v4.1 Source file: bug.ada Page 1
Sun Apr 7 1991 19:25:17
1 procedure BUG is
2
3 ROWS: constant := 5;
4
5 subtype ROW_TYPE is 1 .. ROWS;
6
7 begin
8 null;
9 end;
Compilation Summary
Ada library used: ada.lib
Compile options:
(none)
9 lines compiled.
9 lines listed.
No errors detected.
No warnings reported.
next reply other threads:[~1991-04-08 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1991-04-08 22:22 Esmail Bonakdarian [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1991-04-09 5:35 Is this a (Meridian) compiler bug? Nasser ABBASI
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox