Re: making a son benefit access ton an instanciation of a generic package required as a formal parameter to his father and instanciated by him

[Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>]

I think I already got the idea, and wrote things accordingly... Though a (generic) child of a generic package WILL access through prefixing with his parents'name, not the name of this instance. So in this case things are really declared in the generic package. But I've no problem with that here:

An exception is declared in an package, P1, instance of P1_G, and the RM says I can't use it in a handler... why so ? Renaming doesn't work either. It's stupid, why doesn't it behave like a normal package ! As long as the different instances don't share the same name, there are no reason.
I wrote P1.Exception_Name, not P1_G.Exception_Name, so it should call on the instance. Yet the compiler says "is declared in generic formal package". ??