From: Vincent Marciante <vincent.marciante@l3harris.com>
Subject: Re: Good/best way to enforce library-level instantiation a generic package
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 03:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2020-03-18T03:27:06-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52d51195-fa25-4271-bc48-3f8b63812302@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <r4rs1l$9bu$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 at 9:03:51 PM UTC-4, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> That would reject an instance in a library-level child package, which
> probably isn't what the OP wants.
>
> Randy.
Correct: I would want to instantiate into a library-level package, including a child. I just want to avoid repeated execution of elaboration code of an instance and have any such arrangement that would cause that be at least flagged/warned at compile-time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-18 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-16 18:51 Good/best way to enforce library-level instantiation a generic package Vincent Marciante
2020-03-17 1:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-03-17 10:11 ` Vincent Marciante
2020-03-17 11:21 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-03-18 1:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-03-18 9:23 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-03-20 20:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2020-03-18 10:27 ` Vincent Marciante [this message]
2020-03-17 6:29 ` briot.emmanuel
2020-03-17 10:15 ` Vincent Marciante
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox