From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Documentation tools and standards?
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:30:52 +0100
Date: 2013-12-14T09:30:49+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52ac1739$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d427d12b-732c-4e44-a704-c31498886253@googlegroups.com>
On 13.12.13 22:23, Diogenes wrote:
> As far as the technical documentation...do you guys typically use Doxygen,POD,NDoc, etc..? Which one seems to work best for you?
For software that is distributed with at least Ada spec files,
a good IDE that facilitates source code navigation is helpful.
Description of associated declarations need not be separated
from bodies (like with POD etc), as there aren't any.
Granted, this solution isn't integrated with the additional requirements
of traditional technical press management, where applicable.
There's also AdaBrowse, http://home.datacomm.ch/t_wolf/tw/ada95/adabrowse/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-14 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 21:23 Documentation tools and standards? Diogenes
2013-12-13 22:37 ` erlo
2013-12-13 22:39 ` erlo
2013-12-14 8:30 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2013-12-14 9:05 ` Simon Wright
2013-12-14 10:00 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2013-12-14 23:37 ` Mike H
2013-12-17 10:11 ` Maurizio Tomasi
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox