From: Lucretia <Lucretia9000@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: design changes per Ada 2005/12?
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2011-04-26T09:19:37-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524ddf9b-2727-461a-b14b-e2171cf61190@dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: iot78p$t0v$1@munin.nbi.dk
On Apr 23, 1:41 am, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> "Lucretia" <Lucretia9...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:49b85caa-700c-44c8-8a11-2f512083aca5@r6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
> ...
>
> >P.S: The containers should've used interfaces!
>
> We tried that with the new Queue containers, and IMHO it is a disaster. You
> have to use an extra instantiation and extra formal parameters for a feature
> that you are not going to use on 90% of the programs. (Typically, you only
> use one kind of queue in a program.)
Things like iterators could be implemented with interfaces ok.
Luke.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-21 23:05 design changes per Ada 2005/12? tmoran
2011-04-22 1:10 ` Lucretia
2011-04-22 1:23 ` Shark8
2011-04-23 0:41 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-23 6:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-04-23 21:27 ` Maciej Sobczak
2011-04-26 16:19 ` Lucretia [this message]
2011-04-26 23:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-23 0:36 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox