From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Q: SPARK: visibility of private child in parent's body
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:54 +0200
Date: 2013-08-26T00:00:55+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521a7e97$0$9507$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MPG.2c846cf769987f509896a8@news.zen.co.uk>
On 25.08.13 21:35, Phil Thornley wrote:
> Assuming you are using separate files for each unit, the next place I
> would look would be the index file. Does this identify the files that
> you think it does, and does it contain the private child announcement
> for P.C:
> P components are P.C
Adding the component entry to the index file fixed it (after
removing the P prefixes in the body). Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-25 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-25 13:06 Q: SPARK: visibility of private child in parent's body Georg Bauhaus
2013-08-25 19:35 ` Phil Thornley
2013-08-25 22:00 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox