From: "G.B." <rm-dash-bau-haus@dash.futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Elaboration order handling (Was: Bug in 'gnatmake')
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:24:12 +0200
Date: 2013-06-20T13:24:12+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51c2e65c$0$6634$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wcctxkt61kw.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
On 20.06.13 02:57, Robert A Duff wrote:
> Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> writes:
>
>> Having had to live with products of programmers favoring symbolic
>> cleverness, I naturally think of what happens when some project
>> depend on lexicographical order and then someone wishes to give
>> packages different names. ARGH!
>
> Of course programmers shouldn't do that (depend on lexicographical
> order).
Well, programmers will depend on anything that is known,
more so if the standard defines it. (Like INT_MAX/Max_Int
is 2**31-1, you know...)
However, a configuration pragma for elaboration should be fine?
It says,
"Take this way of walking the dependency graph"
Stating the way then prevents configuration from being an
implicit consequence of the LRM. It also adds a way of
testing different paths of elaboration.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-17 10:57 Range check for type 'Integer' Peter Brooks
2013-06-17 11:23 ` Simon Clubley
2013-06-17 11:54 ` Simon Wright
2013-06-17 12:55 ` Peter Brooks
2013-06-17 13:28 ` Shark8
2013-06-17 13:45 ` Peter Brooks
2013-06-17 21:16 ` Shark8
2013-06-18 10:48 ` Stephen Leake
2013-06-17 12:46 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-06-17 13:23 ` Bug in 'gnatmake' (Was: Range check for type 'Integer') Jacob Sparre Andersen
2013-06-17 13:32 ` Bug in 'gnatmake' Jacob Sparre Andersen
2013-06-17 16:50 ` Bug in 'gnatmake' (Was: Range check for type 'Integer') Robert A Duff
2013-06-17 19:15 ` Peter Brooks
2013-06-17 21:09 ` Shark8
2013-06-17 21:22 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-06-18 1:21 ` Peter Brooks
2013-06-18 6:33 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-06-18 7:29 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-06-17 18:49 ` Bug in 'gnatmake' Simon Wright
2013-06-18 9:09 ` Elaboration order handling (Was: Bug in 'gnatmake') Jacob Sparre Andersen
2013-06-18 17:09 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-18 22:52 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-06-19 1:21 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-06-19 12:38 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-19 20:43 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-06-20 0:37 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-20 19:56 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-06-19 12:22 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-19 15:46 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-06-19 16:41 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-19 20:47 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-06-19 21:36 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-06-20 0:57 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-20 1:09 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-06-20 2:29 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-06-20 6:08 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-06-20 15:11 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-21 5:26 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-06-21 15:48 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-06-21 18:35 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-06-21 19:10 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-21 21:27 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-06-21 20:43 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-06-21 21:44 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-06-21 23:47 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-23 14:43 ` AdaMagica
2013-06-21 18:58 ` null declarative parts (was: Re: Elaboration order handling) Robert A Duff
2013-06-21 20:42 ` null declarative parts Georg Bauhaus
2013-06-20 2:11 ` Elaboration order handling (Was: Bug in 'gnatmake') Adam Beneschan
2013-06-20 14:44 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-20 11:24 ` G.B. [this message]
2013-06-20 15:23 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-19 21:00 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-06-19 22:26 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-06-20 0:31 ` Robert A Duff
2013-06-20 21:36 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-06-19 13:07 ` Bill Findlay
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox