From: google.10.jrz@spamgourmet.com (JrZ)
Subject: Re: MAC address with Win32 bindings.
Date: 12 Nov 2003 05:49:02 -0800
Date: 2003-11-12T05:49:02-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51b33359.0311120549.68c2fcbd@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CmAtyEfetDI6@eisner.encompasserve.org
Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) wrote in message
> Since Windows NT does not run on Macintosh, probably what you want is a
> MAC address rather than a Mac address. Like ADA only the other way around.
I'm bored of reading those bullsh**...
Why not simply answer ?
Maybe you did not understood ...!?! ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-12 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-08 17:15 Mac address with Win32 bindings Alex Xela
2003-11-08 20:45 ` MAC " Larry Kilgallen
2003-11-08 21:37 ` Alex Xela
2003-11-09 12:10 ` Simon Wright
2003-11-09 13:48 ` chris
2003-11-09 22:43 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-11-15 22:38 ` Fionn mac Cuimhaill
2003-11-16 3:07 ` Ada -vs- ADA (was: Re: MAC address with Win32 bindings.) Steve
2003-11-16 12:26 ` Marius Amado Alves
2003-11-16 20:11 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-11-12 13:49 ` JrZ [this message]
2003-11-09 3:27 ` Mac address with Win32 bindings Steve
2003-11-09 8:59 ` Alex Xela
2003-11-09 10:56 ` Alex Xela
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-10 17:58 MAC " Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
2003-11-10 18:08 ` Stephane Richard
2003-11-11 7:08 ` Simon Wright
2003-11-11 8:25 ` Preben Randhol
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox