Re: Asymmetric rwmutex algorithm

Re: Asymmetric rwmutex algorithm

[Pascal Obry]

Le 20/06/2013 23:15, aminer a écrit :
> Question:
> 
> Amine, how can you say this? in the Dmitry Vyukov
> asymmetric rwmutex algorithm there is no hotspot
> in the reader side , so it's really scalable.
> 
> Answer:
> 
> I will still use my RWLock algorithm with the Distributed RWLock
> of Dmitry Vyukov that i have wrote in Object Pascal and
> included in the MSync library, this distributed RWLock will eliminate
> the contention so there will be no hotspot and my RWLock combined with
> the Distributed RWLock will then scale very well.

Well, this becomes really annoying, you pay zero attention to comment
you get here. You post code in Pascal language and now you are starting
some kind of monologue quoting questions from somewhere and you've never
replied to comment here...

The best option at this point is for you to stop posting in comp.lang.ada.

-- 
  Pascal Obry /  Magny Les Hameaux (78)

  The best way to travel is by means of imagination

  http://v2p.fr.eu.org
  http://www.obry.net

  gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B

Re: Asymmetric rwmutex algorithm

[Frédéric Praca]

On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:54:25 +0200, Pascal Obry wrote:

> Le 20/06/2013 23:15, aminer a écrit :
>> Question:
>> 
>> Amine, how can you say this? in the Dmitry Vyukov asymmetric rwmutex
>> algorithm there is no hotspot in the reader side , so it's really
>> scalable.
>> 
>> Answer:
>> 
>> I will still use my RWLock algorithm with the Distributed RWLock of
>> Dmitry Vyukov that i have wrote in Object Pascal and included in the
>> MSync library, this distributed RWLock will eliminate the contention so
>> there will be no hotspot and my RWLock combined with the Distributed
>> RWLock will then scale very well.
> 
> Well, this becomes really annoying, you pay zero attention to comment
> you get here. You post code in Pascal language and now you are starting
> some kind of monologue quoting questions from somewhere and you've never
> replied to comment here...
> 
> The best option at this point is for you to stop posting in
> comp.lang.ada.

You'd better ignore these messages.
A little search on google groups will show you that these messages appear 
also on philosophy and culture groups... Amongst other less readable 
messages from the same author.
Each time, it seems that there are several people inside the same head ;)