From: sjw <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
Subject: Re: anonymous access type
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2009-03-03T13:03:23-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51889345-8760-4804-b706-36a436810719@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: d1fb109a-13d6-4884-9e71-304a58c46e62@w9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com
On Mar 3, 12:25 pm, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now, being a good citizen, I would like to explicitly stress that the
> parameter is passed 'in' instead of relying on implicit mode, so let's
> add the 'in' keyword where it belongs:
Personally I find the 'in' keyword annoying and a waste of 3
characters! Rather like initialising an object of an access type with
":= null". Your mileage obviously varies ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-03 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-03 12:25 anonymous access type Maciej Sobczak
2009-03-03 12:40 ` christoph.grein
2009-03-03 12:44 ` christoph.grein
2009-03-03 13:15 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-03-03 13:43 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2009-03-05 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2009-03-03 21:03 ` sjw [this message]
2009-03-03 22:35 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-03-04 5:47 ` christoph.grein
2009-03-04 16:01 ` Robert A Duff
2009-03-05 1:44 ` Randy Brukardt
2009-03-05 8:52 ` christoph.grein
2009-03-05 11:08 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-03-04 8:30 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-03-04 23:54 ` Robert A Duff
2009-03-05 8:14 ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-03-05 16:27 ` Rob Norris
2009-03-05 17:51 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-03-09 11:40 ` Rob Norris
2009-03-05 20:25 ` sjw
2009-03-06 12:49 ` Stephen Leake
2009-03-05 8:38 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-03-05 15:05 ` Robert A Duff
2009-03-05 15:18 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-03-05 17:50 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-03-05 18:35 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-03-06 0:52 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-03-06 16:25 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox