comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uri Raz <uraz@iil.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Dec Ditching Ada?
Date: 1996/09/10
Date: 1996-09-10T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <513a9r$10na@ilx018.iil.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.842131187@schonberg


Guys (& girls - are you there ? :-),

   I doesnt seem to me like the issue is anything about who owns the compiler,
  whether payments goes for support or developement, or anything the like.

   The issue is about two questions :
    1. Is the GNAT a good Ada compiler ? (= is software X worthy of use ?)
    2. Does support give the bang for the bucks, and will continue to do
       so in the future ?

   As the first question is ignored in this thread, I think it boils down to
  the second - would GNAT users get their money's worth of support or not.

   The arguments claiming that the software's & support's quality having to do
  anything with where the money goes are vacuum thin - people might do good job
  for free, or bad job for good money, and payment might always cover non
  product related expenses (taxes, delivery, company overheads, whatever).

   One should check what he gets and what he pays. Idly philosophising about
  legal intricacies and money distribution wouldnt get anyone anywhere.

 Uri Raz.

 +---------+--------------------+-------+-----+-----+
 | Uri Raz | uraz@iil.intel.com |  Noir | :-) | :-( |
 |   All opinions are mine. Others may share them.  |
 +--------------------------------------------------+





  reply	other threads:[~1996-09-10  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1996-08-22  0:00 Dec Ditching Ada? Charlie Cole
1996-08-22  0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-08-23  0:00   ` Douglas Rupp
1996-08-24  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-22  0:00 ` Howard W. LUDWIG
1996-08-25  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-22  0:00 ` Brian & Karen Bell
1996-08-22  0:00 ` James Squire
1996-08-24  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-26  0:00     ` James Squire
1996-09-04  0:00       ` Uri Raz
1996-09-05  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-05  0:00         ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-05  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-06  0:00             ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-06  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-07  0:00                 ` Use of the term "commercial" (was "Dec Ditching Ada?") Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-07  0:00               ` Dec Ditching Ada? Richard Kenner
1996-09-07  0:00                 ` Dennison
1996-09-07  0:00                   ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-07  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-10  0:00                       ` Uri Raz [this message]
1996-09-11  0:00                         ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-12  0:00                         ` Jon S Anthony
1996-09-16  0:00                         ` Charlie McCutcheon
1996-09-17  0:00                           ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-10  0:00             ` Chris Morgan
1996-09-11  0:00             ` Chris Morgan
1996-09-12  0:00               ` Richard Kenner
1996-09-12  0:00                 ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-23  0:00 ` Klaus Wyss
1996-08-23  0:00 ` Charlie McCutcheon
1996-08-23  0:00 ` Charlie McCutcheon
1996-08-25  0:00 ` Brendan Boulter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-08-23  0:00 Alain Graziani
1996-08-25  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-26  0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-08-27  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox