Re: Ada and OpenMP

[Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>]

On 08.03.13 15:53, Rego, P. wrote:
>> On Thursday, March 7, 2013 4:42:59 PM UTC-7, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> 
>> Ada is about doing things right, and that should be true even for 
>> implementation-defined stuff. And we *need* people to figure out good ways 
>> of doing these things (for instance, a "parallel" classification for 
>> functions would be very helpful). The sloppy way helps little.
> 
> Got your point. 
> Would you have a suggestion on how I could a loop such as "parallelization" like
> 
> pragma OMP(Parallel_For) 
> for I in 1 .. MAX loop 
>    A(I) := A(I) + 1 
> end loop; 

If A is an array of small objects, then with GNAT on Intel,
you can turn on -ftree-vectorize (or -O3) and see what this gives.

Adding -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=2 (old) or -fopt-info-optimize
instructs GCC to report successful vectorizations.