From: amir@iae.nsk.su (Amir Yantimirov)
Subject: Re: Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery
Date: 23 Mar 2003 20:53:59 -0800
Date: 2003-03-24T04:53:59+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5115eb96.0303232053.2fcc7d78@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b5jrs4$2a6fho$1@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message news:<b5jrs4$2a6fho$1@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de>...
> Amir Yantimirov wrote:
>
> > Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message
> > news:<vqil7v81l8p8ocbv2ke9ectl8l33rr3gs8@4ax.com>...
>
> >> In my view to fully support ADT would mean that any of such type
> >> interfaces would be available for private implementation.
> >
> > In my ideal world you don't need inhere anything:
> > http://www174.pair.com/yamir/programming/interfaces.htm
>
> Maybe it is just a wording problem. Many dislike the word "inheritance".
> (:-))
Oops. Sorry. Anyway, the idea is type functionality may be extended
freely so it don't have to be specified in type declaration.
>
> >> -----
> >> (*) I intentionally omit type ... is tagged ..., because I believe
> >> that *all* types have to be tagged.
> >
> > Not rare opinion. But I found it somewhere contradicting with you
> > background :). Lots of types I works with has hardwired bits structure.
>
> Yes, but this does not mean that a hardwired bits cannot be "tagged". You
> can have even Booleans "tagged". The idea is to have different
> representations for Boolean and Boolean'Class.
Fine. But what's the gain? I rarely needs any _polymorphic_ feature
for such types above "this type is distinct four-byte thing".
Amir Yantimirov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-24 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-14 17:22 Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery Robert C. Leif
2003-03-14 17:57 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-03-14 18:16 ` chris.danx
2003-03-14 18:17 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-15 14:18 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-03-16 1:06 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-18 10:37 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-03-18 15:34 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-19 11:12 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-03-20 8:42 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-20 14:27 ` Frank J. Lhota
2003-03-21 8:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-21 17:16 ` Pascal Obry
2003-03-22 9:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-22 14:11 ` Pascal Obry
2003-03-22 23:12 ` AG
2003-03-23 9:01 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-23 8:51 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-24 16:52 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-24 18:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-24 18:33 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-25 5:04 ` Amir Yantimirov
2003-03-25 19:55 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-25 20:22 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-26 13:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-26 15:06 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-26 16:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-26 17:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-26 18:21 ` Bill Findlay
2003-03-26 18:40 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-22 10:01 ` Amir Yantimirov
2003-03-23 8:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-24 4:53 ` Amir Yantimirov [this message]
2003-03-24 18:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-25 5:48 ` Amir Yantimirov
2003-03-25 15:53 ` Frank J. Lhota
2003-03-25 16:44 ` Robert A Duff
2003-03-25 18:24 ` Frank J. Lhota
2003-03-25 20:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-27 19:45 ` Frank J. Lhota
2003-03-27 21:25 ` Pascal Obry
2003-03-28 13:34 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-04-01 14:38 ` Frank J. Lhota
2003-04-02 7:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-26 7:48 ` Amir Yantimirov
2003-03-26 13:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-26 7:32 ` Amir Yantimirov
2003-03-20 23:28 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-03-21 8:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-21 21:07 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-03-22 9:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-03-22 10:05 ` AG
2003-03-22 15:25 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-03-22 19:27 ` AG
2003-03-22 21:45 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2003-03-22 22:28 ` AG
2003-03-23 23:47 ` Robert A Duff
2003-03-28 16:34 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-03-18 15:58 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-19 11:05 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-03-23 11:31 ` Florian Weimer
2003-03-23 23:39 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-03-15 12:52 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox