From: dulman@ibm.net
Subject: RE: Two ideas for the next Ada standard (Leonid Dulman)
Date: 1996/09/03
Date: 1996-09-03T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50go7h$479a@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> (raw)
As began debate concerning future of the language standard, I would
like to do some remarks to future ADA-0x.
1. ALIASED is more common notion then RENAMES and (it seams to me)
this key word needn't.
2. OUT parameters have such chances as IN OUT
3. Maybe for calling entry in SELECT statement with DELAY to write
in the form :
<entry_name>(...) WITH DELAY [UNTIL] <time>;
ACCEPT <entry_name>(...) WITH DELAY [UNTIL] <time> DO ... END;
This construction will allow to expect rendezvous up to a given
time moment, or given time interval.
4. To add the subroutine parameter type ALIASED, that will allow to
use inside it reference to the subroutines with " 'ACCESS " or
" 'UNCHECKED_ACCESS" parameters.
5. Nongeneric form of packages DIRECT_IO and SEQUENTIAL_IO.
Parameter RECORD_SIZE to add for parameter's list in procedures
CREATE and OPEN
(for example in form RECORD_SIZE:=<type's name>'size;).
6. To specify use ACCESS and UNCHECKED_ACCESS attributes for aliased
variable. Now (in basic) it is necessary to use UNCHECKED_ACCESS
attribute.
Leonid
reply other threads:[~1996-09-03 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox