From: "Thomas Løcke" <thomas@12boo.net>
Subject: Re: Tasking and timing out
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:43:41 +0200
Date: 2012-09-20T22:43:41+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505b7ffc$0$281$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d021b7c-705e-4795-9f4e-3f82dc2776ba@googlegroups.com>
On 09/20/2012 08:33 PM, Adam Beneschan wrote:
> First of all, doesn't AWS.Net.Std.Connect have its own facility for
> handling timeouts? I'm looking at the source, and it looks like it
> does, but I don't know if I'm looking at the most recent version. If
> it does, you should definitely use that, and not rely on ATC.
>
> Anyway ...
> [snip lots of good stuff]
Awesome explanation Adam! Your post really drove the point Dmitry made
home.
And yes, AWS does have some facilities for this, and yes I'm using those
in my new non-ATC solution.
"then abort" is out the window!
:)
--
Thomas L�cke | thomas@12boo.net | http://12boo.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-23 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 8:17 Tasking and timing out Thomas Løcke
2012-09-20 8:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-09-20 9:36 ` Thomas Løcke
2012-09-20 10:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-09-20 20:40 ` Thomas Løcke
2012-09-20 18:33 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-09-20 20:43 ` Thomas Løcke [this message]
2012-09-20 21:24 ` sbelmont700
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox