From: "Thomas Løcke" <thomas@12boo.net>
Subject: Re: Tasking and timing out
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:40:57 +0200
Date: 2012-09-20T22:40:57+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505b7f58$0$281$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1drka4ljbi2m6$.18hcn0srcmy4v$.dlg@40tude.net>
On 09/20/2012 12:21 PM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> #1 + #2.1.1 above. E.g. some computations, even with controlled types
> involved. Anything else requires *careful* analysis and thus is necessarily
> very fragile. Ergo, for the software design POV, it is better to forget
> about ATC, too problematic.
I've taken your advice to heart Dmitry, and re-coded the routine without
ATC, and it is much better for it.
Thank you for your help and for explaining exactly why my solution was
bad.
:)
--
Thomas L�cke | thomas@12boo.net | http://12boo.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-23 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 8:17 Tasking and timing out Thomas Løcke
2012-09-20 8:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-09-20 9:36 ` Thomas Løcke
2012-09-20 10:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-09-20 20:40 ` Thomas Løcke [this message]
2012-09-20 18:33 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-09-20 20:43 ` Thomas Løcke
2012-09-20 21:24 ` sbelmont700
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox