From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Emulating placement new
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 17:00:55 +0200
Date: 2012-07-29T17:00:56+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50155028$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vch67jsk.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
On 29.07.12 15:56, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is there a way to specify a storage pool (or something similar) on the
> allocator, and not on the access type?
>
Would subpools do? (I see that the access type's storage pool must be a
Root_Storage_Pool_With_Subpools.)
allocator ::=
new [subpool_specification] subtype_indication
| new [subpool_specification] qualified_expression
subpool_specification ::= (subpool_handle_name)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-29 13:56 Emulating placement new Florian Weimer
2012-07-29 14:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-29 14:15 ` Florian Weimer
2012-07-29 14:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-29 15:00 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2012-07-29 16:04 ` Robert A Duff
2012-07-29 18:48 ` Florian Weimer
2012-07-29 19:14 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox