Re: Differences in finalization of controlled objects between gcc 4.6 and gcc 4.7

[Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>]

On 19.07.12 15:59, Markus Schï¿œpflin wrote:
> Am 19.07.2012 15:45, schrieb Georg Bauhaus:
>> On 19.07.12 14:23, Markus Schï¿œpflin wrote:
>>> Is there a way to have the objects created in place directly in the array?
>>
>> Can you make the type limited?
> 
> No, I need to be able to copy them around. But IMHO that shouldn't make a
> difference in this case, the compiler should be able to figure out that it can
> construct the objects in place, shouldn't it?

Not sure, wouldn't this optimize the AFCed actions away without
the user saying so? Anyway, maybe renaming works better?

   subtype SMALL is POSITIVE range 1 .. 2;
   type A is array (SMALL) of CTRL.T;

   function MAKER return A is
   begin
      return RESULT : A;
   end MAKER;

   X : A renames MAKER;