Re: protected type interrupts

["REH" <me@you.com>]

"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org> wrote in message 
news:bvJHg.152959$1i1.59895@attbi_s72...
>
> Right. I said that in another message, IIRC. The message you were replying 
> to was mostly nit picking, correcting the OP's assumption that the entry 
> was being executed BY the interrupt handler.
>
It's not my assumption.  It IS being executing by the handler, and the 
compiler vender says the LRM allows them to do so.  References to LRM given 
here show they are correct.  My assumption (that was proven incorrect) was 
that it should been executed by the task that called it.  The standard 
states that this cannot be relied upon (which explains why you cannot call 
"current_task" from an entry).

REH