From: afn03257@freenet3.afn.org (Daniel P Hudson)
Subject: Re: What about Ada?
Date: 1996/08/10
Date: 1996-08-10T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ui85c$5sn@huron.eel.ufl.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4ue8fu$1c4@huron.eel.ufl.edu
dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote:
>Daniel said
>" Hmm, Not sure since they just developed another standard for Ada, whats
> that like 10 now or something?"
>Daniel, I guess you are not very familiar with Ada! There have been
>precisely TWO standards for Ada, the original Ada, now referred to as
>Ada 83, and the current Ada standard, referred to as Ada 95. These are
>the only two standards, they appeared in 1983 and 1995 respectively.
>Unlike the situation with Pascal, the ANSI standard is identical to
>the ISO standard.
>Perhaps you meant 10 in base 2? :-)
That covers ISO, now try the DoD's standards that came before ANSI/ISO
stuck their nose in it. Back when ACVC was responcible for determining
whether or not a implementation was conforming, actually I think they still
do this today maybe, although I doubt anyone checks to see whether it
has thier OK or not. There aren't actually 10, maybe 5 or 6 different
standards for Ada from its original implementation by the Dod up to
today's ISO Ada 9X' [95' isn't it?].
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-08-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-08-06 0:00 What about Ada? H Marx
1996-08-06 0:00 ` Aron Felix Gurski
1996-08-07 0:00 ` bourass
1996-08-07 0:00 ` Carl Bowman
1996-08-08 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-08-08 0:00 ` John Herro
1996-08-09 0:00 ` Daniel P Hudson
1996-08-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-10 0:00 ` Daniel P Hudson [this message]
1996-08-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-12 0:00 ` Howard W. LUDWIG
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-08-06 0:00 Simon Johnston
1996-08-08 0:00 ` David Wheeler
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox