From: pbgraham@engin.umich.edu (Paul B. Graham)
Subject: Re: ADA - VHDL
Date: 1996/07/10
Date: 1996-07-10T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4s09jq$ddn@srvr1.engin.umich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 31E2391F.A16BEBD@sh.bel.alcatel.be
> I also see no reason for some syntax differences ("to" in VHDL, ".." in ADA)
VHDL has ascending and descending ranges. Ada has only ascending ranges.
I find it more convenient and understandable to write, e.g.,
for i in 10 downto 1 loop -- VHDL
than
for i in reverse 1 .. 10 loop -- Ada
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-07-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-07-09 0:00 ADA - VHDL P. Cnudde VH14 (8218)
1996-07-09 0:00 ` Jacques Rouillard
1996-07-10 0:00 ` Paul B. Graham [this message]
1996-07-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1996-07-10 0:00 ` Laurent Gasser
1996-07-11 0:00 ` P. Cnudde VH14 (8218)
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Paul B. Graham
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-15 0:00 ` Brian "Cheebie" Merchant
1996-07-16 0:00 ` P. Cnudde VH14 (8218)
1996-07-16 0:00 ` jos de laender vh14 7461
1996-07-16 0:00 ` Stephen A. Bailey
1996-07-22 0:00 ` Nick Weavers
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Jens Hansson
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
1996-07-13 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1996-07-17 0:00 ` Chris Papademetrious
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox