From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Subject: Re: [ANN] Player-Ada 2.0.3.0 released
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:12:24 +0100
Date: 2006-10-30T09:12:24+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4qlqd0Fna0r5U1@individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 13cwqawj5cl48$.pyzh3o7n3tnz.dlg@40tude.net
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> Yes it is, but I actually meant the system architecture:
>
> Sensors / Actuators
> ^
> | DAC/ADC, I/Os etc
> y
> Controller [closed, runs nobody knows what]
> ^
> | RS232
> V
> Extension board [open, runs Linux with an [Ada] application on]
That's it, and you explain it mroe clearly than me.
> Architectures like this were widely used in industrial automation 10 years
> ago. History tends to repeat itself... (:-))
At least the move to USB will simplify/cheapify new systems?
> Presently, it is no problem to bring a small embeddable 100MBaud Ethernet
> switch on the board and connect sensors/actuators directly to the robot's
> "LAN." The problem is that Ethernet/fieldbus-capable sensors/actuators are
> quite expensive. Ada were an excellent candidate for implementation of a
> middleware for "software wiring" of process variables in such a system.
Regards,
Alex.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-30 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-26 17:51 [ANN] Player-Ada 2.0.3.0 released Alex R. Mosteo
2006-10-27 7:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-10-27 8:42 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-10-27 9:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-10-27 10:03 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-10-27 12:08 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-10-27 13:29 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-10-27 14:50 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-10-30 8:12 ` Alex R. Mosteo [this message]
2006-10-31 14:14 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-10-27 20:12 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-10-28 9:53 ` mosteo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox