comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ucaa2385@alpha1.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de (Peter Hermann)
Subject: Re: next "big" language?? (disagree)
Date: 1996/06/04
Date: 1996-06-04T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4p1l65$35qi@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4p0fdd$4ml@news.atlantic.net


Kurt Johmann (johmann@moal.com) wrote:
: Programming languages are almost completely subjective, because the only

I strongly disagree

: minds apparently like that kind of enforced discipline (masochist types,
: perhaps :-), but to my mind it was a build-your-own-straightjacket-and-
: wear-it kind of approach to programming.

the opposite is true: a professional is always thankful for every
hint from the compiler or environment for potential errors.
Working with languages of the past like Fortran or C is true
masochism. I have worked on very large systems in Fortran
(one was a half million source lines of code, the other 300_000 sloc)
and we had to run the systems on every hardware brand.
I can see no advantage to allow e.g. a memory overwrite error,
by accident, or, e.g. an outside range value at run time or
a wrong subroutine call due to bad parameter profile.

When I decide, as a programmer, that a peculiar type or
variable may have a value in the range from 1 to 9, can you please
explain me why it should be useful to assign a value of 10 or
4711 or -1234?
I will justify the value of that freedom in your favour:
This has the big advantage that the typical Fortran, C, or C++
programmer being not immediately aware of an erroneous code
is happy to catch the error all-day-long and when the day is done,
he is proud to have found this bug and fully convinced to 
have fulfilled his work of the day.
In contrast, a poor Ada programmer does not have this fun:
a potential error is revealed at the moment of the very first 
compilation/execution. What a pity! No fun at all ;-(
The product life cycle is shortened. No bug chasing.
no extra lint steps, because its unfortunately in 
the language design.

btw: Ada is the first useful (and even readable) Pascal
     with free compilers running on any platform

--
Peter Hermann  Tel:+49-711-685-3611 Fax:3758 ph@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de
Pfaffenwaldring 27, 70569 Stuttgart Uni Computeranwendungen
Team Ada: "C'mon people let the world begin" (Paul McCartney)




       reply	other threads:[~1996-06-04  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4p0fdd$4ml@news.atlantic.net>
1996-06-04  0:00 ` Peter Hermann [this message]
1996-06-04  0:00   ` next "big" language?? (disagree) The Amorphous Mass
1996-06-04  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-06  0:00       ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-12  0:00       ` Help making ada pretty CSC Trusted Systems Group
1996-06-14  0:00         ` Sandy McPherson
1996-06-19  0:00         ` Ruediger Berlich
1996-06-04  0:00     ` next "big" language?? (disagree) Peter Hermann
1996-06-04  0:00       ` The Amorphous Mass
1996-06-05  0:00         ` Michael David WINIKOFF
1996-06-07  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-05  0:00     ` Ian Ward
1996-06-05  0:00       ` The Amorphous Mass
1996-06-08  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-08  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-08  0:00           ` The Amorphous Mass
1996-06-09  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-05  0:00   ` ++           robin
1996-06-05  0:00     ` Ian Ward
1996-06-05  0:00       ` Ian Ward
1996-06-06  0:00         ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-07  0:00           ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-08  0:00             ` O'Connor
1996-06-07  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-10  0:00             ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-11  0:00           ` ++           robin
1996-06-11  0:00             ` James_Rogers
1996-06-11  0:00               ` Kevin J. Weise
1996-06-11  0:00             ` David Weller
1996-06-11  0:00             ` Chris Warack <sys mgr>
1996-06-11  0:00         ` ++           robin
1996-06-11  0:00           ` Ian Ward
1996-06-12  0:00             ` ++           robin
1996-06-12  0:00               ` Ian Ward
1996-06-11  0:00       ` Jon S Anthony
     [not found]   ` <4p60nk$imd@euas20.eua.ericsson.se>
     [not found]     ` <4p8lmq$oq7@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
1996-06-11  0:00       ` ++           robin
1996-06-11  0:00         ` A. Grant
1996-06-12  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-17  0:00             ` A. Grant
1996-06-18  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24  0:00                 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-06-19  0:00             ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-20  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24  0:00                 ` Adam Beneschan
1996-06-24  0:00                 ` Keith Thompson
1996-06-25  0:00                   ` Simon Read
1996-06-25  0:00                   ` Robert A Duff
1996-06-24  0:00                 ` Dale Stanbrough
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` Adam Beneschan
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` Lars Duening
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` hopkinc
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` Assertions (was: Re: next "big" language?? (disagree)) Robert A Duff
1996-06-24  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-25  0:00                       ` Robert A Duff
1996-06-28  0:00                         ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24  0:00                     ` Assertions (a different intent?) Gary McKee
     [not found]                     ` <4qrljg$15l8@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
1996-06-28  0:00                       ` Assertions (was: Re: next "big" language?? (disagree)) Robert Dewar
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` next "big" language?? (disagree) Marc C. Brooks
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` Marc C. Brooks
     [not found]                   ` <4qsbm7$r1s@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
1996-06-28  0:00                     ` "Assert"? "Assume"? (was: next "big" language?? (disagree)) Alexander Bunkenburg
1996-06-28  0:00                       ` Ian Collier
1996-07-01  0:00                     ` Cameron Laird
1996-06-25  0:00                 ` next "big" language?? (disagree) Brian Nettleton @pulsar
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-28  0:00                     ` Fergus Henderson
1996-06-28  0:00                       ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-30  0:00                         ` Fergus Henderson
1996-06-30  0:00                           ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-25  0:00                 ` Darin Johnson
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` Dale Stanbrough
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` A. Grant
1996-06-12  0:00           ` ++           robin
1996-06-12  0:00             ` A. Grant
1996-06-14  0:00               ` Richard A. O'Keefe
1996-06-12  0:00         ` Richard A. O'Keefe
1996-06-12  0:00           ` ++           robin
1996-06-12  0:00             ` Richard A. O'Keefe
1996-06-13  0:00               ` ++           robin
1996-06-13  0:00               ` ++           robin
1996-06-12  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-14  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-15  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-18  0:00     ` Adam Beneschan
1996-06-18  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-28  0:00     ` Assertions (an heretic view) Michel Gauthier
1996-06-28  0:00       ` Robert A Duff
1996-06-28  0:00       ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-06  0:00 ` next "big" language?? (disagree) Dale Pontius
1996-06-11  0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-12  0:00 ` Help making ada pretty Pedro de las Heras
1996-06-18  0:00 ` next "big" language?? (disagree) ++           robin
1996-06-07  0:00 Ian Ward
1996-06-08  0:00 ` O'Connor
1996-06-10  0:00   ` Matt Kennel
1996-06-11  0:00     ` Robb Nebbe
1996-06-11  0:00     ` Ian Ward
1996-06-12  0:00       ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-06-09  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox