From: James E. Hopper <jhopper@erinet.com>
Subject: Re: performance tuning with gnat
Date: 1996/05/13
Date: 1996-05-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4n7hti$bmr@eri.erinet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4n79if$qhc@mdnews.btv.ibm.com
In article <4n79if$qhc@mdnews.btv.ibm.com> Dale Pontius,
pontius@twonky.btv.ibm.com writes:
>I seem to remember seeing something about exceptions a month or two
>back, that takes effect in GNAT 3.03 or 3.04. I think I heard that
>the exception handling has been sped up significantly, just about to
>the point of no penalty for a non-taken exception. I'd wait for more
>authoritative word on this one, though. It still might be worth
>checking out.
Since Robert is on the road, and off email for a couple days i will
respond to this
based upon what he and Wes Embry at SGI have told me on this issue.
3.04 has a change which is inteneded to speed exception handling up quite
a bit.
while this has been verified to work well on the sun, Wes tells me it has
also been
verified (well this was a month or more ago) to NOT change things much on
the sgi.
thus i guess your milage may vary.
best jim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-05-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-05-10 0:00 performance tuning with gnat Eric Anthony Spear
1996-05-10 0:00 ` James E. Hopper
1996-05-10 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-05-13 0:00 ` Dale Pontius
1996-05-13 0:00 ` James E. Hopper [this message]
1996-05-14 0:00 ` Geert Bosch
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox