From: \x06\x02 ralph@ifr.luftfahrt.uni-stuttgart.de (Ralph Paul)
Subject: Re: Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!?
Date: 1996/04/22
Date: 1996-04-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4lfr8l$36ju@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 317906B6.42853EF6@cpmx.saic.com
"Linh C. Nguyen" <Linh.C.Nguyen@cpmx.saic.com> wrote:
> Kenneth Mays wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was interested in replacing a lot of old Fortran-77 code with Ada
> > code. Does anyone feel that Ada95 is
> > better than FORTRAN? Should we replace this old programming language
> > with a better one? Should we
> > RETRAIN the thinking processes of our MBA students that FORTRAN (that
> > great formula translator of 1977) should
> > be maintained but not used for future development?
> >
> > From what we have have seen of Ada95, does it measure up?
> >
> > Ken (kmays@msn.com)
> > USAF
>
> Not by the engineer or scientist's point of view.
> --
>
> Linh.C.Nguyen@cpmx.saic.com
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Couldn't disagree more !!
Do you have strong enough personal experience to back this statement ??
Regards,
Ralph Paul
ralph@ifr.luftfahrt.uni-stuttgart.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-20 0:00 Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!? Kenneth Mays
1996-04-20 0:00 ` Linh C. Nguyen
1996-04-20 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1996-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-22 0:00 ` David Weller
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-04-21 0:00 ` busigin
1996-04-22 0:00 ` [this message]
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Thomas Koenig
1996-04-29 0:00 ` marukka
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-04-23 0:00 ` David Kristola
1996-04-23 0:00 ` Jim Carr
1996-04-26 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1996-04-29 0:00 ` AdaWorks
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox