From: dweller@dfw.net (David Weller)
Subject: Re: Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!?
Date: 1996/04/22
Date: 1996-04-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4lfqqa$lku@dfw.dfw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.830136560@schonberg
In article <dewar.830136560@schonberg>, Robert Dewar <dewar@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>Here is one respect in which Ada 95 is clearly superior to Fortran
>for numerical applications. In Ada 95, there are accuracy requirements
^^^^^^
>for the trig functions, there are no such requirements in Ada 95.
> ^^^^^^
Um, Robert, your Freudian slip is showing :-)
--
Visit the Ada 95 Booch Components Homepage: www.ocsystems.com/booch
This is not your father's Ada -- lglwww.epfl.ch/Ada
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-20 0:00 Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!? Kenneth Mays
1996-04-20 0:00 ` Linh C. Nguyen
1996-04-20 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1996-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-04-22 0:00 ` David Weller [this message]
1996-04-21 0:00 ` busigin
1996-04-22 0:00 `
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-04-23 0:00 ` David Kristola
1996-04-23 0:00 ` Jim Carr
1996-04-22 0:00 ` Thomas Koenig
1996-04-29 0:00 ` marukka
1996-04-26 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1996-04-29 0:00 ` AdaWorks
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox