From: Serge.Rybin@di.epfl.ch (Serge Rybin)
Subject: Re: Visibility of packages in child bodies...
Date: 1996/04/17
Date: 1996-04-17T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4l2rfo$3l1@disunms.epfl.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4l1uss$acu@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au
In article <4l1uss$acu@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>, Dale Stanbrough <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> writes:
:> If a series of library packages are created as...
:>
:> package useful is...
:>
:> package a is...
:>
:> package a.useful is...
:>
:> then in the package body of a.useful is it possible to
:> refer to package "useful" without using a library level renaming?
:>
:> e.g. in the following...
:>
:> with useful;
:>
:> package body a.useful is...
:>
:> package "useful" is not directly visible.
But, for sure, it is possible to refer to STANDARD.useful.
And you can use the "local" renamings of STANDARD.useful instead of
(annoying) library level renaming.
Sergey Rybin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-17 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-17 0:00 Visibility of packages in child bodies Dale Stanbrough
1996-04-17 0:00 ` Serge Rybin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-04-17 0:00 Jean-Pierre Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox