From: morphis@fnalv1.fnal.gov
Subject: GNAT, OS/2, Libraries
Date: 1996/04/10
Date: 1996-04-10T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4kgf38$qaa@fnnews.fnal.gov> (raw)
Hi,
I occasionally lurk here and one of the comments I have read
about GNAT in general and GNAT for OS/2 in particular is that there
is a lack of libraries. Excuse my ignorance but what does that mean?
Are we talking about something basic to the language? or about
libraries of routines that will find the roots of Bessel functions,
draw squares or create x-widgets?
While these last are presumably of importance getting wide
acceptance, for me personally (not being a professional programmer
or anything close) their lack is something I can easily live with.
Thanks for any light you can shed on this.
Robert
Morphis@physics.niu.edu
next reply other threads:[~1996-04-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-10 0:00 morphis [this message]
1996-04-10 0:00 ` GNAT, OS/2, Libraries Dale Pontius
1996-04-10 0:00 ` Tore Joergensen
1996-04-10 0:00 ` morphis
1996-04-11 0:00 ` Tore Joergensen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox