comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* URGENT - Please Help Me - 80386 Vs MIL-STD-1750A
@ 1996-04-02  0:00 John McCabe
  1996-04-04  0:00 ` Jack Horner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: John McCabe @ 1996-04-02  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)


I have been asked to jot down a list of advantages and disadvantages
of using an Intel 386 against a GPS MA31750 (MIL-STD-1750A) processor
by the end of this week (5th April 1996).

The software will be a real-time design in an embedded system,
probably developed and cross-compiled using a UNIX box.

I am in the unfortunate position that the company I work for has built
a MIL-STD-1750A computer for use in space (i.e. using rad-hard parts)
so it is going to take some pretty good arguments really to persuade
them to let us use a 386. Having had no experience in using a 386 as
an embedded target, I'm not sure that the reasons I could come up with
myself would be persuasive enough so I'd be enormously grateful if
anyone could help me with the following:

1) The number and quality of Sun SPARC hosted 386 cross-compilers 
   versus MIL-STD-1750A cross-compilers.

2) The availability of cross-compilers on other hosts.

3) Any serious problems with the compilers themselves or the customer

   support.

4) Recommendations of particular compilers.

5) Purchase cost.

6) People's general opinions on how easy it is to develop a system    
   using these particular processors.

I would be particularly interested in any figures anyone has regarding
productivity (e.g. number of lines of code / day) on these processors,
particularly with respect to use of Ada.

I would be most grateful for any advice/opinions/vendor contacts that
you could provide me with.

Please contact me by email as I have posted this to a number of (I
hope) relevant but complementary groups.

If this message is out of place in your group please forgive me.

Best Regards
John McCabe <john@assen.demon.co.uk>





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: URGENT - Please Help Me - 80386 Vs MIL-STD-1750A
  1996-04-02  0:00 URGENT - Please Help Me - 80386 Vs MIL-STD-1750A John McCabe
@ 1996-04-04  0:00 ` Jack Horner
  1996-04-08  0:00   ` Carl Bowman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jack Horner @ 1996-04-04  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)


Phil Brashear (works for CTA) at Wright-Patterson AFB (US) 
probably has the most complete list of Ada/1750A compiler 
sources, including points of contact.  This list used to be 
published in the now-defunct  "Ada/JOVIAL Newsletter" of the 
Wright-Patt High Order Language Control Facility.  I have 
hardcopy of some of the most current listings.  Contact me by 
E-mail  for them.

-- 
Jack Horner                    | Voice:  719-475-9891
PERSONYX, Inc.                 | Fax:    719-475-7088
314 E. San Rafael Street       | E-mail: 73007.502@compuserve.com
Colorado Springs, CO  80903    |




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: URGENT - Please Help Me - 80386 Vs MIL-STD-1750A
  1996-04-04  0:00 ` Jack Horner
@ 1996-04-08  0:00   ` Carl Bowman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carl Bowman @ 1996-04-08  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)



The Ada Information Clearinghouse maintains the official validated
compilers list for the AJPO.  We also have an online searchable
databse on our Software Engineering host
(http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us).  We will also search for validated
compilers for particular platforms if one calls (703) 681-2466.

Carl Bowman
Ada Information Clearinghouse




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1996-04-08  0:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1996-04-02  0:00 URGENT - Please Help Me - 80386 Vs MIL-STD-1750A John McCabe
1996-04-04  0:00 ` Jack Horner
1996-04-08  0:00   ` Carl Bowman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox