From: l117593@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Cordes MJ)
Subject: Re: Correction to previous post
Date: 1996/04/03
Date: 1996-04-03T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ju209$mg4@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.828527000@schonberg
Robert Dewar (dewar@cs.nyu.edu) wrote:
[snip]
: ... I certainly am not aware of any commercial compiler for
: Ada, C++, or even C that has been subjected to complete coverage and
: path testing (including of course use-def path testing, since that i
: is what is involved here).
How can we continue to claim that Ada is a better programming language
than C++, or even C, if we continue to group Ada with these languages
when it is convenient?
;-)
Mike
###
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael J Cordes
Phone: (817) 935-3823
Fax: (817) 935-3800
EMail: CordesMJ@lfwc.lockheed.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-03 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-03 0:00 Correction to previous post Robert Dewar
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Cordes MJ [this message]
1996-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-03 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-04-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox