From: jcn@swl.msd.ray.com (John Norcross {83602})
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.03 for OS/2
Date: 1996/03/27
Date: 1996-03-27T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4jbduo$1pi@swlpqf.msd.ray.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4j948j$jk7@twonky.btv.ibm.com
pontius@twonky.btv.ibm.com (Dale Pontius) writes:
>In article <4j8t6p$ae2@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, tojst1+@pitt.edu (Tore Joergensen) writes:
>>
>> I am happy for the free compiler I get. I would not be suprised if the number
>> of paying customers are below ten (I wouldn't even be suprised if it is zero).
>> It is quite obvious that the OS/2 port require more fiddling than Unix ports
>> (even emx can't change that).
>>
>Up until now, I've been quite happy, too. I've had a little off-line
>discussion with Bob Dewar on this, and the picture is not quite what
>we had thought. Without his OK, I won't release the number of paying
>OS/2 users of GNAT, but suffice it to say that GNAT gets OS/2 ports
>largely out of Mr. Dewar's own personal interest. This is not meant
>to accuse him of 'being fickle', or anything else, but circumstances
>do change, and his personal interest may not be sufficient to keep
>OS/2 revisions of GNAT coming in the long term.
>Therefore, if folks are really interested in OS/2 GNAT, we should get
>either Paying Customers, or someone willing to assist with the OS/2
>porting effort. Some of the GNAT ports are currently maintained by
>volunteers, so there is precedent for this.
>As for myself, I've found no problems so far with GNAT. All of my
>problems have been learning the language with Lovelace, examples,
>and an old pre-95 copy of Grady Booch. Still, at the appropriate
>time, I plan to look into becoming a Paying Customer, if possible.
>Also, Three Cheers to Mr. Dewar for keeping us running so far!
>Dale Pontius
>(NOT speaking for IBM)
O.K. Robert,
Get your ACT together (apologies for the pun) and offer a
"Friend's of OS/2" support license for GNAT. Charge $25 per
student/hobbyist/home user and give us a bottom of the barrel
support services - (Response to problems guaranteed within
504 hours :) :)
I realize that this won't generate much capital, but at least it might
keep the porting effort for an OS/2 version funded. Who knows, you
might be surprised at how many OS/2 supporters/users there are out
here! I for one would be happy to sign up. (At $1200 a seat,
you won't find very many takers on the home front!)
Both Ada's and OS/2's popularity seem to be gaining mind share.
I realize you are a big fan of OS/2 - why not consider this sugestion
and help promote GNAT's continued health on OS/2?
Ada's got a date with Merlin on my system this summer :)
Regards,
John Norcross
(Not speaking for Raytheon) ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-03-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-22 0:00 GNAT 3.03 for OS/2 Dale Pontius
1996-03-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-22 0:00 ` GNAT 3.03 for RS/6000 AIX 3.2 (was: GNAT 3.03 for OS/2) David J. Bacon
1996-03-25 0:00 ` GNAT 3.03 for OS/2 Norman H. Cohen
1996-03-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-25 0:00 ` Dale Pontius
1996-03-25 0:00 ` John Howard
1996-03-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-26 0:00 ` Tore Joergensen
1996-03-26 0:00 ` Dale Pontius
1996-03-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-26 0:00 ` Tore Joergensen
1996-03-27 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-27 0:00 ` John Norcross {83602} [this message]
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-25 0:00 ` Tore Joergensen
1996-03-25 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-25 0:00 ` Norman L. Reitzel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-03-29 0:00 John Howard
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Richard Kenner
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-31 0:00 Kees de Lezenne Coulande
1996-04-01 0:00 Simon Johnston
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox