comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tojst1+@pitt.edu (Tore Joergensen)
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.03 for OS/2
Date: 1996/03/26
Date: 1996-03-26T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4j9q8e$fgb@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4j948j$jk7@twonky.btv.ibm.com

Dale Pontius (pontius@twonky.btv.ibm.com) wrote:
: Therefore, if folks are really interested in OS/2 GNAT, we should get
: either Paying Customers, or someone willing to assist with the OS/2
: porting effort. Some of the GNAT ports are currently maintained by
: volunteers, so there is precedent for this.

If there aren't any military projects or something like that made on
OS/2, I think it will be difficult to find people that will pay $1200
each year for support. I'm sure the support is fast and good, but at
least I can't afford to use that kind of money on a programming language.
Professional programmers that make general purpose programs are likely
to choose another language, since there aren't many nice libraries for
GNAT on OS/2. Sure Ada and GNAT are nice, but I think most people that
make programs for the non-critical market will prioritize simple GUI
and database connections, rather than the strong typing in Ada. If there
was a low-price alternative for non-professional programmers ($50 - 100),
it would be possible to get some paying customers. The priority for these
customers would of course be somewhere between non-paying and full-paying
customers. It's just that I think that even with a low price like this,
it would be difficult to get more than 10-30 customers. That wouldn't be
enough to make OS/2 ports a high priority, but maybe it is enough together
with Dewar's interest in OS/2 to keep the OS/2 ports coming?

It would be nice if somebody volunteered to do the OS/2 ports, but I think
that that job require some knowledge about GNAT, gcc and emx. I know that
I don't have the time to do something like that for the moment (partly
because I would have to spend time to get that knowledge), and I doubt that
I will get time to do it in the future (of course it is a question about
prioritzing). If anybody have a good idea about how to ensure continued
efforts to keep the OS/2 ports coming, speak out!

: As for myself, I've found no problems so far with GNAT.

I haven't found any problems with the last version either, but it would
be nice with a version that does some more optimizing. :-)

: Also, Three Cheers to Mr. Dewar for keeping us running so far!

 \       \       \
  \___    \___    \___
  / | \   / | \   / | \
 /  |  \ /  |  \ /  |  \ ...what... cheers... oh... I thought you said
                         chairs... well, three cheers for Dewar!!! :-)
-- 
+-------------------------+-------------------------------------------+
| Tore B. Joergensen      | e-mail : tore@lis.pitt.edu                |
| Centre Court Villa      | web    : http://www.pitt.edu/~tojst1      |
| 5535 Centre Avenue # 6  |                                           |
| Pgh, PA 15232, USA      | Norwegian MSIS-student at Univ. of Pgh.   |
+-------------------------+-------------------------------------------+




  parent reply	other threads:[~1996-03-26  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1996-03-22  0:00 GNAT 3.03 for OS/2 Dale Pontius
1996-03-22  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-22  0:00   ` GNAT 3.03 for RS/6000 AIX 3.2 (was: GNAT 3.03 for OS/2) David J. Bacon
1996-03-25  0:00   ` GNAT 3.03 for OS/2 Norman H. Cohen
1996-03-25  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-25  0:00   ` Dale Pontius
1996-03-25  0:00     ` Tore Joergensen
1996-03-25  0:00       ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-25  0:00       ` Norman L. Reitzel   
1996-03-25  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-25  0:00     ` John Howard
1996-03-25  0:00       ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-26  0:00         ` Tore Joergensen
1996-03-26  0:00           ` Dale Pontius
1996-03-26  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-26  0:00             ` Tore Joergensen [this message]
1996-03-27  0:00               ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-27  0:00             ` John Norcross {83602}
1996-03-28  0:00               ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-28  0:00                 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-29  0:00                   ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-29  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-28  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-03-29  0:00 John Howard
1996-03-29  0:00 ` Richard Kenner
1996-03-29  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-31  0:00 Kees de Lezenne Coulande
1996-04-01  0:00 Simon Johnston
1996-04-01  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox