From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Subject: Re: Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:31:24 +0200
Date: 2006-07-26T16:31:24+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ipcgkF4rd7nU1@individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mkm9hlbnrlzs$.11cdfqtw95jja.dlg@40tude.net
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2006 14:54:00 +0200, michael bode wrote:
>
>> The other question would be: would it make more sense to fork an
>> independent GMGPL GtkAda or join the GNAVI/GWindows project and work
>> on the GTK+ port of GWindows?
>
> GtkAda could be reworked from scratch. It must be boring and a lot of
> work, but not much complex. GtkAda is quite thin bindings. One could even
> make stuff like Gtk_Widget_Record limited controlled and make GTK+
> interfaces Ada interfaces...
Or maybe the people working on the C binding generator of SWIG could use
some help, and start from there. I think that's the really critical Ada
project waiting to happen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-26 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-21 19:18 Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0 M E Leypold
2006-07-22 16:06 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-22 21:46 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-23 9:24 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-23 4:54 ` Hyman Rosen
2006-07-24 23:23 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-25 9:01 ` michael bode
2006-07-25 16:37 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-07-25 21:42 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-26 9:58 ` Steve Whalen
2006-07-26 11:08 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-07-26 12:54 ` michael bode
2006-07-26 13:59 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-26 14:05 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-07-26 14:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-07-26 14:31 ` Alex R. Mosteo [this message]
2006-07-26 18:12 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-07-27 11:01 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-07-30 0:16 ` Steve Whalen
2006-07-25 17:35 ` Simon Clubley
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox