From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Subject: Re: entries and access parameters
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:53:59 +0200
Date: 2006-07-13T19:53:59+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4hnfhcFegpdU1@individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 44b683f3$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net
Stuart wrote:
> "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:4hn8k3FdjobU1@individual.net...
>> I'm trying to find in the 95 rationale the explanation for this point
>>
>> http://www.adahome.com/rm95/rm9x-09-05-02.html
>>
>> (13) An entry_declaration in a task declaration shall not contain a
>> specification for an access parameter (See 3.10)
>> I'm curious about that prohibition, mainly to know if workarounding it
>> with
>> a type like
>
> I can't help with the reference to 3.10, but the annotated ARM gives the
> following after 9.5.2 (13)
Ahhh thanks, so it was there where I read about it. Now it's coming back.
(removed the relevant part of the aarm).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-13 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-13 15:55 entries and access parameters Alex R. Mosteo
2006-07-13 17:45 ` Stuart
2006-07-13 17:53 ` Alex R. Mosteo [this message]
2006-07-13 20:19 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox