From: bwburnsed@aol.com (BWBurnsed)
Subject: Can compilers do this?
Date: 1996/02/22
Date: 1996-02-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4gjd6g$mfq@newsbf02.news.aol.com> (raw)
I came across some very strange looking code that someone else wrote,
long, long ago, and (apparently) in a universe far, far away. But before I
make too many critical comments, I want to be sure I'm not missing
something.
Repeatedly in this code (in many files), there are places where a floating
point variable is tested to see if it is negative. However, the way it is
done is:
if X * abs(X) < 0.0 then ...
Is there (or was there ever) some pathological anomaly about floating
point
implementations that would make a conversion (abs) and floating point
multiply
preferable to testing a sign bit? Can, and will, optimizing compilers
recognize the
real test desired in such constructs, i.e. reduce it to a sign bit test?
Also, suppose Y and X are floating point variables, and M and B are
CONSTANT floating point variables (not named numbers) initialized to
1.0 and 0.0 respectively. If one writes
Y := M * X + B ;
can (and will) any compiler reduce this to
Y := X ;
If not, could it do so if M and B were named numbers?
Thanks,
BwB
next reply other threads:[~1996-02-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-02-22 0:00 BWBurnsed [this message]
1996-02-23 0:00 ` Can compilers do this? Robert Dewar
1996-02-23 0:00 ` Cordes MJ
1996-02-23 0:00 ` Stuart Palin
1996-02-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-02-23 0:00 ` Mark A Biggar
1996-02-24 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-02-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-02-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-02-26 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-02-26 0:00 ` BWBurnsed
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-02-26 0:00 Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox