* Re: TLD Ada Compilers
[not found] ` <824495197.12415@assen.demon.co.uk>
@ 1996-02-18 0:00 ` Jardine Barrington-Cook
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jardine Barrington-Cook @ 1996-02-18 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
john@assen.demon.co.uk (John McCabe) wrote:
>meridork@netvision.net.il wrote:
>>In Article<823892045.6378@assen.demon.co.uk>, <john@assen.demon.co.uk> write:
>>> Path:
>>news.NetVision.net.il!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.i
>>nternetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!demon!assen.demon.co.uk
>>> From: john@assen.demon.co.uk (John McCabe)
>>> Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
>>> Subject: TLD Ada Compilers
>>> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 18:53:58 GMT
>>> Lines: 11
>>> Message-ID: <823892045.6378@assen.demon.co.uk>
>>> NNTP-Posting-Host: assen.demon.co.uk
>>> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: assen.demon.co.uk
>>> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've used TLD's Ada compiler for a while now and I am convinced it is
>>> rather poor.
>>>
>>> I've only used the MIL-STD-1750A version and would like to hear from
>>> anyone who has something to say, good or bad, about this version or
>>> any other versions.
>>>
>>>
>>Hi
>>Do you work with ADA on 1750a ????
>Well, yes!
>Why?
>Best Regards
>John McCabe <john@assen.demon.co.uk>
We used the TLD Ada compiler on the Huygens project for ESA. This used
MAS281 SOS implementations of 1750A.
Speaking for myself, I was disappointed in the compiler, and in the
support we got. However, despite being a mission critical high profile
application I guess that when "push comes to shove" we were only a
single licence fee.
Be interested in your experiences.
Cheers
Jardine Barrington-Cook (barrington@logica.com)
Space Division - Logica (personal opinions, subject to change)
"...See worlds on worlds compose one universe,
observe how system into system runs..." A. Pope, 1773
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread