From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Subject: Re: Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong?
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:15:05 +0200
Date: 2006-06-23T15:15:05+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4g27nqF1k6iegU2@individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uwtb8jbwn.fsf@acm.org
Stephen Leake wrote:
> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>
>> + GPL editions compilers still look more buggy than 3.15p. GPL 2005 is
>> definitely worse.
>
> Well, that may be true for your applications.
>
> I encountered no bugs with GPL 2006; while 3.15p has significant bugs.
I guess you've not tried to make significant use of interfaces? In a week of
gpl2006 usage I've hit three bugs there.
On the other hand, dot notation for tagged objects seems much more robust,
not a single quirk for now (whereas 2005 was plagued).
I had (as noted in another thread) very bad experiences with 3.15p for
windows because of a single hidden bug so, in comparison, bugs that blow
right in your face don't bother me that much.
Apart from that, I'd say that gnat is getting better and better fast with
each release, and now that Ada05 is being frozen I bet in few time the gcc
branch will get really interesting.
> In a system as complex as a compiler, different people will have
> different problems.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-23 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-20 16:56 Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong? M E Leypold
2006-06-21 7:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-21 12:29 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-21 12:46 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-21 13:23 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-22 19:10 ` Simon Wright
2006-06-23 8:24 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-23 13:14 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-23 13:24 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-24 20:33 ` Simon Wright
2006-06-24 20:56 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-26 7:32 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-26 11:16 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-26 12:13 ` [Ada in Debian] GtkAda and GNAT versions Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-26 12:25 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-27 20:55 ` Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong? Simon Wright
2006-06-27 22:26 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-22 2:07 ` James Dennett
2006-06-22 6:37 ` Duncan Sands
2006-06-22 16:53 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-22 19:01 ` Pascal Obry
2006-06-23 8:37 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-22 19:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-23 4:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-06-23 12:26 ` Stephen Leake
2006-06-23 13:11 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-23 13:15 ` Alex R. Mosteo [this message]
2006-06-23 9:55 ` A smaller self contained test case. Was: " M E Leypold
2006-06-23 10:03 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-23 11:04 ` And a Workaround: Was: A smaller test case / Compiler Bug M E Leypold
2006-06-23 11:12 ` Possible memory leaks when reading/writing variant records M E Leypold
2006-06-24 11:46 ` A smaller self contained test case. Was: Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong? Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-24 12:27 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-24 12:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-24 13:53 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-24 19:58 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-24 20:22 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-25 7:59 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-25 10:51 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-26 6:22 ` Martin Dowie
2006-06-24 21:21 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-25 21:36 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-26 21:53 ` Possibly fixed in gcc 4.1.1, but bug box -- Was: Re: A smaller self contained test case M E Leypold
2006-06-27 18:24 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-27 22:58 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-28 10:32 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-07-03 1:38 ` Steve Whalen
2006-07-03 10:36 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-28 8:41 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-28 8:51 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-28 10:43 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-23 10:00 ` Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong? M E Leypold
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-23 17:42 Anh Vo
2006-06-26 6:59 ` Alex R. Mosteo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox