From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: OOP in Ada: Alternatives for "protected" scope
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 12:43:33 +0200
Date: 2012-05-04T12:43:30+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fa3b2d2$0$6547$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4fa3b14b$0$6555$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
That was too quick; but moving "private" before Link in the
example gets around the "protected" operations of abstract
types needing to be public:
private
--
-- Add your type of computation here to be performed
-- at some time during the execution of Do_Something:
--
procedure Link
(Object : in out A;
Computation: Calculators.Calculator'Class);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-04 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-03 21:27 OOP in Ada: Alternatives for "protected" scope Felix Krause
2012-05-03 21:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-05-04 18:48 ` Felix Krause
2012-05-04 22:00 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-05-05 8:28 ` Felix Krause
2012-05-05 11:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-05-05 4:33 ` Shark8
2012-05-03 23:34 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-05-04 1:41 ` BrianG
2012-05-04 10:37 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-05-04 10:43 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2012-05-04 12:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox