From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Ann: Zip-Ada v.42
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:01:42 +0100
Date: 2012-02-11T14:01:42+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f3666b6$0$6637$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fb5b1b7-da17-424a-a1bb-2cd918a8ca2f@f30g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
On 11.02.12 10:35, Gautier write-only wrote:
> Actually, I found a much better way to check purity, which is building
> and testing the library with another compiler (specifically, ObjectAda
> 7.2.2 SE).
> Nothing is worth a second opinion...
> Plus, I get from time to time a feedback about other compilers :-).
It's good to have mini tools made by compiler vendors that allow
anyone to catch a glimpse of what their compiler will likely accept.
A tool like a relatively dumb syntax checker.
If the tool reuses some source text of their compiler's,and is
reasonably up to date, it might help promoting actual portability.
I'd guess, or hope, that ICC's pretty printer tool is such
a thing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-11 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-10 12:53 Ann: Zip-Ada v.42 Gautier write-only
2012-02-10 15:59 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-10 16:22 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-02-12 10:26 ` Gautier write-only
2012-02-11 1:13 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-02-11 9:35 ` Gautier write-only
2012-02-11 13:01 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2012-02-11 13:14 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox