From: Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: [Q] task discriminants and invariant expressions in SPARK
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:04:14 +0100
Date: 2011-10-31T14:04:15+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4eae9ccf$0$6567$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4eae96be$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
On 31.10.11 13:38, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> (I couldn't think of an easy workaround but that may be just me.)
Apparently, the following seem to be o.K., no more flow error,
but is it cheating?
procedure Test (V : Name) ...
... case V is ...
Test (Id);
Just one indirection...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-31 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-31 12:38 [Q] task discriminants and invariant expressions in SPARK Georg Bauhaus
2011-10-31 13:04 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2011-11-03 9:34 ` Phil Thornley
2011-11-03 12:11 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-11-03 14:15 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox